The Religion of Luc Ferrandez

(Version française ici)

I’ve never been a fan of the Plateau-Mont-Royal neighborhood’s mayor, Luc Ferrandez. I’ve heard all the same things as everyone else. How he has transformed the Plateau into an impassable maze for automobiles and that many businesses (which give the neighborhood its charm) have greatly suffered. Yesterday, however, he announced his resignation in a long tirade on Facebook, alluding to irreconciable differences with Montréal’s mayor, Valérie Plante. Apparently Plante is too eager to please everyone and hasn’t gone full speed ahead with some kind of totalitarian green plan. I suppose he has a point, as she needs to win elections and cannot do anything too drastic.

I’ve never been a fan of Valérie Plante either or her municipal party Projet Montréal, mostly due to their anti-nationaliste attitude, steeped in the cult of “diversity” that artificially props up “visible minorities”. I’ve always said that these “minorities” in Montréal are not really minorities. Why would a Pakistani or a Nigerian be considered a minority when there are 200 million of them in Pakistan and 200 million of them in Nigeria? In Québec, there are only about 7 million Quebecers (out of a population of 8.4 million). But hey, Valérie Plante wants to manage a global city and doesn’t see herself as the mayor of the metropolis of French America.

So when I heard the news about Luc Ferrandez, I thought good riddance.

Then I heard Ferrandez being interviewed by Patrice Roy. He said said a lot of things that I found questionable, though I couldn’t believe my ears near the end of the interview when he so casually stated:

"I look at my son and say to myself, 'He is the first generation who will not have the right to procreate'. That urgency pushed me to [resign as mayor]. » (my translation)

So, if I understand this correctly, Ferrandez is favorable for the restriction of having families. What surprised me was how matter of factly he stated this – like it was nothing. Political elites seem to be hiding less and less their outright contempt for humanity – although it has been discussed in the background for some time now.

The environmental movement’s origins come from think tanks like the Club of Rome, whose output includes The First Global Revolution. This book promotes the end of industrialization and “sustainability’’, with a jaw-dropping admission that the “green” revolution was engineered by corporate enactment:

“The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.” (p. 75)

There you have it. This book admits that the agenda was invented with a clear intention of being anti-human, geared towards a new, invented religion of environmentalism with Mother-Earth-Gaia as the goal of human worship (I have previously treated this subject here). The worship of the creation and not the creator is classic paganism. The trendy hipsters that obsess over environmentalism and celebrate their new sacred holidays like “Earth Day” are merely duped tools. They love to go on about their pseudo-environmentalism, but never speak out about real environmental concerns like glyphosate, phytoestrogens, geo-engineering, GMO foods and animals, dumping thousands of gallons of untreated sewage into the Saint Lawrence, etc. Things will only worsen as families cease to exist, economies decline and culture disintegrates.

Then on Bernard Drainville's show, Ferrandez says that by 2030, Québec society would be ripe enough for a "progressive authoritarian leader". Even if Quebec as we know it today disappeared and became a huge pristine boreal forest, then what? This would affect global GHG emissions by only around 0.16%. Not even half of a city like Delhi. So calm down, dear Luc, and accept how little you matter.

Returning to his elaboration on the urgency to restrict procreation:

"The greatest joy of a human being will be deprived of our grandchildren". (my translation)

As usual, nothing on the double standard regarding the massive immigration of our day. No, it is we who must stop having families, while continuing to take more and more foreigners in such huge numbers that their integration and assimilation become impossible. We need to reduce the population, yet are also told that we need massive immigration because we’re not having babies.

So, what do our elites really want? Is this going to turn into the plot of the dystopian film Logan's Run? In order to limit overcrowdedness and protect the environment, your life is limited to the age of 30. Then you are invited to a pagan-inspired ceremony, where, under the guise of rebirth, your body is simply disintegrated. A small sacrifice for Gaia. Praise Gaia!