« Version française ici »
For those paying attention,
Québec as a distinct society or nation gets touted around here and
there. Robert Bourassa said that Québec is a distinct society and Stephen Harper’s government recognized Québec as a nation within a united Canada. Such
declarations might seem somewhat significant, it seemed to me that this empty
rhetoric used by the Liberals and federalists is tossed out to merely pacify
Québec nationalists. Besides, most anglophones don’t even know what a nation is
– believing that “nation” is the same thing as “country” and then smugly
declare that Québec is not a nation. Thus, the agenda of erasing real
differences through multiculturalism is continued.
In case you hadn’t noticed,
there is a war on distinctions. Nonetheless, the use of Orwellian doublethink
has got everyone confused. Look at how Canadian federalists use the word
“diversity” as if it were a true array of distinct peoples promoting cultural
and economic enrichment. Québec is the best example of real diversity in North
America, though when Canada says “diversity”, what it means is just melting
into the monocultural anglophone blob.
Different civilizations
generate distinct societies, which is an outcome of the soul of a people – and
this is good. Real diversity is naturally good. However, in our post-modern
era, the term “diversity” is the starting point of the doublethink doctrine
with the aim of eliminating true diversity. We are told that we must evolve
beyond distinctions and borders.
From the Vatican-oriented
geopolitical book, The Keys of This Blood, Malachi Martin talks about a faction
of people that he calls the Mega-Religionists, those who work to persuade us
that all religions and worldviews are fusing into a single globe-spanning
mega-religion:
“…the so-called Mega-Religionists [are part of the] one great Temple of Human Understanding. The truly global home of all nations will all be harmonized into one. Chameleon-like, they are to be found basking at the height of power everywhere in the West – in Transnationalist boardrooms and Internationalist bureaucracies, in the hierarchies of the Roman, Orthodox and other Christian churches; in major Jewish and Islamic enclaves already dedicated to the total Westernization of culture and civilization.” (p. 38)
Martin lists some of the
people among these Mega-Religionists, who “live their lives as though all
political borders were already extinguished.” People like John Foster Dulles,
Henry Luce, Queen Elizabeth II, the Duke of Edinburgh, Pierre Teilhard de
Chardin, Pierre Elliot Trudeau, John D. Rockefeller, and many more. The
Mega-Religionist mind proposes, in contrast to the Humanist worldview, that
human comfort is not merely a question of physical comfort. Religion, too, is
essential to the comfort of human civilization. However, separate religions are
neither necessary nor desirable. In fact, for the sake of peace, all religions
must fuse into one great religion:
“…the whole of Humanity shall remain a united people, where Muslim and Christian, Buddhist and Hindu shall stand together, bound by a common devotion, not to something [from the past], but to something ahead [in the future], not to a racial past or a geographical unit, but to a dream of a world society with a universal religion of which historical faiths are but branches… [while keeping] the more harmless folkloric and colorful elements of each religion, for these have a certain function in terms of appeasement and camouflage.” (p. 298)
Hmmmm, is this why Justin
Trudeau plays dress up with every single ethnic group? Or why most people think
multiculturalism just means going out for sushi or shish taouk after the
traditional African dance performance?
How could such a thing as the
monocultural mega-religion possibly be implemented? Through altering the
perception of evil as something different from hurting others or the absence of
goodness. In our day and age, the new and current definition of evil is found
in the notions of separation and distinction. The idea of being separate in any
way, whether it be philosophical, spiritual, political or economic – this is
the new Satan. Being your own person or country, being male, being female,
being Caucasian, being one type of tradition instead of another type, being
Quebecer, being Mexican, being Russian – all of that must be classed and
understood as the new description of evil. Martin goes on to say that:
“since the expected Mega-Religion would contain elements of every religion, and would be universally acceptable, it would be called monodeism.” (p. 298)
The coming world religion
will be total Monadism,
which is also what Aldous Huxley discussed in his book The Perennial Philosophy. Anything and everything must be blended into one.
Self-proclaimed “citizens of the world” can be whatever they want on an
individual level, as long as they don’t claim that their identity or belief is
exclusive or true, since the new definition of evil is distinction.
Separateness is immoral. Today’s SJWs are
but the beginning phases of this new cult.
If I may use some
“conspiratorial” language, the goal of something like Freemasonry is to
create a revolutionary force for the installation of democratic republics. This
has been discussed in several papal encyclicals from In eminenti to HumanumGenus as well as in the first Québec nationalist-themed novel Pour la patrie by Jules-Paul Tardivel. Now you might think that republics
sound fair and good, that the removal of religion from the sphere public life
is OK or even desirable (which always comes with the removal of tradition, as
this falls into the same category as religion – this is laicism or
secularism.
But would the ideas of
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Thomas Paine or Thomas Jefferson bring us to the kind of
conservative traditionalism that some
“natural-rights-theory-non-aggression-principle” libertarians would like to
have? Are there any historical examples of an organic and healthy tradition and
society that are also purely secular? No. All of those ideas are part of the
(French, American and later world) revolution, leading to what Huxley called
the Final Revolution,
where the population is standardized and inconvenient human differences are
ironed out for the emerging of mass produced models of human beings who love
their servitude.
It seems to me that by
eliminating distinction and demonizing the idea of separation and borders, one
creates a simulacrum of a nation and an empty shell (isn’t this what Canada
is?). It becomes an anti-metaphysical imperium, at war with all that is
traditional, natural and organic. The modern world is characterized by
relativism – which is the big lie – and we in Québec are not in any way spared
from this. Of course Québec “separation” has to be portrayed as evil, as the
isolation from people and from the world. Nothing could be further from the
truth, but people are unaware that certain global interests have declared war
on what is “distinct”, while they promote the world mega-religion (aka the monoculture).
